Thursday, November 10, 2011

11 10 11 Bearing Witness to The Wholeness of Ministry


Each meeting of a presbytery has its own character. Some are celebratory and glad. Others are weighty and deliberative. Lately, our meetings have been rather more weighty than usual, mostly due to the rather dramatic changes underway in church and culture. It was therefore a great joy at our last meeting of the Presbytery of Yukon to spend an evening with the Rev. Cobbe Palm, one of our PC(USA) Mission Co-workers from The Philippines.


There were several things that made Rev. Palm’s presentation memorable. His winsome and joyous presence was just what was needed in an otherwise heavy meeting. The wonderful Power Point slides added color and visual images to his talk. But what struck me most was the fabulous history of consistent, ongoing ministry of the Presbyterian Church in the Philippines.


The thing from his talk that really stood out for me was the very
Rev. Cobbe Palm

wholistic nature of Presbyterian mission at its best. Rev. Palm pointed out that from the beginning the Presbyterians’ mission strategy was to care for the whole person in its ministry: mind, body and soul. In the 1800’s the Presbyterians built the mind, body and soul institutions of schools, hospitals and churches. Since then times have changed. Now, the church has added to that list by engaging in a very troublesome issue worldwide, and especially in the Philippines, the issue of sex trafficking.


Traffickers are lying to parents and young people, promising them good work in a far-away place that will help support their families. The truth is that these young people are spirited away to the sex trade. The Presbyterians and others have entered into this situation to provide intervention, healing and training to help get people out of these situations. Further, the Presbyterians have been very involved in advocating for societal changes so this can’t go on. The churches, themselves, are lifting up disciples of Jesus Christ as people who build ministries that continue to care for people—mind, body and soul.


This, of course, is a hallmark of the Reformed branch of Christianity. We have always believed that saving the soul is important, but have understood that God cares for the whole person, and that Christians and Christian ministry must also care for the whole person. It was a pleasure to be reminded of that and to witness some of the good work that God continues to do through the Presbyterian Church. It was a great gift to have the Rev. Cobbe Palm among us to share the story.

Monday, February 7, 2011

On Protestants, Right Relationships and Earthcare


This is the text of a talk I was gave on January 30, 2011 as part of the Anchorage Interfaith Council’s Earthcare Forum. There were seven religious groups with speakers on the panel. Each chose passages from their sacred texts and had 8 minutes to for comments based on those texts, followed by an hour of questions from the audience.

The panel included speakers from a Muslim group, two different sects of Buddhism, a Jewish Rabbi, a Roman Catholic professor of religion, an independent Christian Pentecostal, and a Presbyterian (me).

Basically, we all agreed that the world’s situation is dire and that the religious communities have much to say on the subject. Our beginning points certainly differed, as one might expect from such varied traditions. One person even quoted a 1960s vintage book that criticized Western Culture's version of Protestant teaching for contributing to the lack of Earthcare through the ages. This blog begins with my initial comments which, coincidentally, call on Protestants to repent for not taking their own stance seriously enough, and end with one point from the Q & A period that I thought was particularly important.]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am Curt Karns, executive presbyter for the Presbytery of Yukon. I am also a member of an organization called Yukon Presbyterians for Earthcare, so I was especially glad to be invited to participate in an interfaith conference with that very title: Earthcare! I was also very happy to see that some of the other speakers are basing their talks on those passages of the Bible which make it clear that Earthcare is an imperative for those of us from the Judeo-Christian tradition. This sets me free as one of the Christian Protestant voices here today to speak specifically from the Protestant point of view.

In my opinion, one of the Scripture that sums up much of the Protestant stance on faith is found in Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians, Chapter 2, verses 8-10:

For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God— 9not the result of works, so that no one may boast. 10For we are what he has made us, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand to be our way of life.

This passage is about faith-life in general, but also has the potential to greatly add to any faith-based conversation on Earthcare, whether that be an interfaith conversation or an intra-Christian conversation. This passage asks us to wrestle with the question of what gives ultimate meaning to human existence. Ultimate meaning is one part of what salvation is about. This passage then goes further and challenges us regarding how we are to understand what we are to do—our works—in the world.

It is precisely our works that are at issue in the struggles for Earthcare. So much of what we human beings have collectively done in the world have not turned out to be good for our planet, or even for the long-range well-being of human beings. And part of the problem for Protestants has been that we have not taken the guidance that our own favorite Scripture passages, like this one from Ephesians, would give us.

According to this passage from Ephesians, we can stop fretting about whether we can achieve a good relationship with God—that part is given. We have no need to prove to the universe, or even to ourselves, that we are “good enough.” Instead we have been given an ongoing covenantal relationship with God.

For us, covenants signal relationships in which the parties involved agree to be in relationship with each other, and understand their own identities differently because of that relationship. Indeed, all covenantal relationships—marriage, parenthood, etc—call one to live differently in the world than if one were not a part of that relationship. According to Ephesians, once we know that we are persons-in-relationship with God, the way we live should reflect this new reality. We must now know ourselves as people whose way of life is the doing of good works.

Unfortunately too many people in America, including many Protestants, I’m sorry to say, live as if they had this Scripture backwards. They live as if they were still trying to earn proper praise for their existence, and do that through a strange definition of worthiness actions. Americans try to gain wealth to prove that we are successful; we seek prestige to prove our place in the human pecking order; we seek power to show the world our importance. And we seek subdue land and sea to prove that we are the masters and not the servants.

These are hardly the good works that the Scripture calls for. In the Christian tradition there are two parts to our ministry. Our ministry is to celebrate the gifts God has given each one to bring. And our ministry is to be a ministry of reconciliation.

Reconciliation is about being reconciled to God, but also to others. We are to work for reconciliation between one another in the faith community, between one another in our cultures and societies, and between ourselves and all creation. Our good works are about establishing right relationships such that everyone thrives. And because of who we are—members of this whole creation that God so loves—we absolutely must work for right reconciliation between human beings and the planet Earth.

These Scriptures, then, call people of faith to reframe our thinking of what a successful human being is from the secular cultural model to a biblical, faith-based model. Unfortunately, Scripture has often been interpreted through the lens of Western culture rather than the other way around. Genesis 1 through Genesis 2:4 tells about the seven days of creation. To hear Western culture interpret that passage, we are created in the image of God and God created everything in six days—which proves God’s lordship. Humans, too, need to be working to prove their worth. But a more consistent reading would note that the pinnacle of God’s creation was not the sixth day, in which humans (and animals, though we usually don’t mention the animals) were created. A more consistent reading shows that the seventh day, when God rested from work and just stopped to celebrate being in relationship with this whole of creation, was the pinnacle of creation and the proper model for us to emulate as the image of God.

Being made in God’s image, then, should be to celebrate the wonder of all creation, to enjoy being a part of creation and to love and tend it just as God does. This, of course, also includes celebrating families and friends and the fullness of human potential, as well.

Somehow we have turned this teaching on its head. Instead of knowing that we are already worthy of relationship with God, and turning our lives to standing for the restoration of damaged relationships, we seem bound to work hard to for our own prestige and make excuses for standing by and watching as the world suffers the consequences.

Reconciliation with creation means first recognizing how badly we have been in caring for our relationship with the ecosystem and repenting. Reconciliation means exploring how much damage has been done and knowing that we are responsible. Reconciliation means then reshaping our own lives in such a way as to participate in different ways of life that might lead to a better future for all.

My thesis, then is that we need to call people back to delve deeply into their faith traditions. There is old wisdom there, inspired by God. By letting culture define our faith and our very selves, rather than allowing the our faith-values to guide us as God’s ambassadors to our culture, we have been complicit in producing the consequences the world now faces. By going back to our roots in the face of this crisis, we can be essential in the needed movement for change.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[An opportunity for another comment came up during the Q & A that seem particularly significant. Someone asked how we all understood our relationship to the environment as it relates to Earthcare. My response was that there is a changing view among some of us, which can be summarized by a minority view on how to understand Genesis 2:1. When translated literally, that verse uses the same terminology as the geneologies that show up later in Genesis--"These are the GENERATIONS of the creation of heaven and earth when they were made." Some of us are taking this as a true genealogy to say that we are related to the whole of creation, and the different members (species) have varied responsibilities to one another. Earthcare is something humans must take seriously as a part of the family of creation. It is about living in right relationships.]

Monday, January 31, 2011

Future of Ministry in Alaska

This year (2011) I will primarily blog about important considerations for the Presbytery of Yukon as they are thinking about the future of ministry. Some of the topics will not be on customary ministry topics. For instance, in the previous post (January 31) I spoke of the potential effects of higher fuel prices.

Actually, I wanted to write about the confluence of a number of factors that will lead to the changes I wrote about, but decided that was too complicated for a blog post--I will blog about some of the other factors in later posts.

Strangely, today I cannot get any graphs to upload. So, tomorrow I will try to upload the graphs that went with the previous post.

Curt

The Future: Alaskan Ministry in an Expensive Energy World

One of the big ministry questions facing the church of today is how to minister to a society that will be forced to deal with extremely rapid and sustained increases in energy costs.[1] See below for a brief analysis and some graphs.[2]


This is a huge consideration for us in Alaska. Over 98 percent of our food is flown to Alaska from the Lower 48 states, along with nearly all of our consumer goods. The projected scale of increase in transportation costs means that life will have to change dramatically very soon. I therefore want to offer a few initial thoughts on what this might mean for the church.

1. Future economics will make transportation so costly that locally self-sustaining economies will have to be developed (or redeveloped as in the past).

    1. Families and small communities will have to be more self sufficient and self-sustaining. This means learning to do for ourselves will become a trend. Cooperative groups will be more self-sufficient than solo individuals or families, which means building communities and neighborhoods that can work together will be essential.

    2. Christians have a long history of building community around various ministry causes. Yet, as a whole our society has lost much of that ability. Is this part of the gospel we have to offer the world? If so, how do we begin preparing to meet that ministry need, how do we recapture our ability to build community around specific needs? The awareness of this need is only beginning to rise up in the larger society just now but will expand rapidly in the near future. Can the church connect its ability to build cooperative community around Christian mission with the world’s emerging need to build cooperative community around sustainable skills?

2. Mission is most effective when it recognizes real needs and organizes to meet those needs. There are a number of needs that go along with the future economy. Here are a few that come to mind as I brainstorm about the future:

    1. Food: Organizing neighborhoods to garden effectively. Note that by the end of WWII New York City was producing nearly 25% of its food from rooftop and balcony gardens within the city.

    2. Helping neighborhoods organize to share gardening crops, or to share equipment or expertise (not just gardening, also maybe maintenance, etc) would help them reduce costs.

    3. Forming community together is hard work, because of the personalities involved and the natural conflicts that appear. Processes of reconciliation are available through so many Christian resources and would be of service in building the new reality.

    4. The level of transition needed from current lifestyle (expanding consumer economies and a consumer mentality) to the Post Peak Oil lifestyle will be huge. Helping people cope with that level of change will be an important ministry.

    5. To deal with ongoing relationships over distance will require continued improvement of high tech communications. How can we use current high tech communication today, and how do we help shape future ministry through technological means?

    6. Cross-cultural communication is always challenging, and cross-cultural partnering and visioning is even more challenging. How can we continue as a connected “body of Christ” faith community with much more expansive travel and less face-to-face time?

    7. Connecting these ministries of necessity both with an awareness of the adventure of new life in the Holy Spirit, and with the basics of the Christian gospel and life will be essential for the spiritual grounding of the emerging new society.

    8. In this cosmopolitan world, we need to ask God to guide us in our relationships with other peoples of faith who are not Presbyterian…and also how to shape relationships with peoples of faith who are not Christian.

3. Most young people are less interested in maintaining old religious structures than they are interested in living authentically for God and discovering the adventure of how the Spirit will lead them and form them for the future. They are therefore connecting through social media, and forming local small groups to explore these possibilities.

    1. Can we help such groups to be more effective in raising up disciples of Jesus Christ?

    2. Can we help such groups as they develop missionally, impacting their communities with the love of God?

    3. How can these intentional faith communities fit in with the Post-Peak Oil emerging society?


Recommended Reading: Peak Everything: Waking Up to the Century of Declines
, by Richard Heinberg, New Society Publishers, 2010.


[1] So many of our world oil fields are in decline that we are facing a rather dramatic decrease in world oil supply for the foreseeable future, at the same time we are facing a rather dramatic increase in world demand for oil (especially from India and China). This is because there have been no large new oil discoveries since the late 1970s, and older sources (like Prudhoe Bay) eventually decline. The world appears to have peaked in production in 2006-2008. Further projections (Heinberg, Richard: Peak Everything; See the Preface) show that we are too late in developing alternative energy sources fast enough to be able to avoid a very large impact on our economy and lifestyle.

[2] Note: There have been no large discoveries worldwide since this graph was made.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Happy New Year

This is the greeting I sent to the Yukon Presbyterians for Earth Care. Although it was crafted with them in mind, I find it wonderfully fitting for all, so I include it below.

May God bless you all in this new year!

****************************************

Happy New Year Everyone!

This is a traditional time of the year for Christians to greet one another with great warmth. The new year marks a moment to embrace new beginnings--and we have learned that new beginnings are very real, but only become real because of God's gift of grace-in-action. Indeed, for many cultures, the New Year's "Watch Night Service" at New Year's is a much bigger religious celebration than Christmas. So Happy New Year!!! Greeting each other at this time is another way of verbally celebrating God's grace-filled new beginnings!

We know there is much trouble in this world. We also know that the inability of our society to live in proper relationship with this planet is downright depressing. But in this New Year's season, we should claim the reality of God's new possibilities, and dedicate ourselves to live out of this good news.

I hope you are all having a wonderful holiday week.

Happy New Year!

Curt

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

My View of the 219th General Assembly, PC(USA)


(Photo: Curt Karns, Exec; Antonia Panaya, Youth Advisory Delegate from Gambell Presbyterian; Rev. Tom Letts, Minister Commissioner from Trinity Presbyterian. Not in photo: Beulah Nowpokahok, Elder Commissioner from Gambell Presbyterian)

I was interested in the difference in tone between this General Assembly and the 218th General Assembly (2008) and the 219th (2010). There was a definite sense that this General Assembly did not come to do battle with one another, but seriously sought to find ways to discern God’s will as clearly as possible.
There were certainly enough weighty and important issues for this General Assembly to vote on, and to differ with one another on. They voted…
• on the wording of the paragraph describing ordination standards, including the famed “fidelity and chastity” wording (voted to make the change eliminating that wording—see my earlier blog entry).
• on whether or not to make an authoritative interpretation of the constitution with regard to civil unions (voted not to make the authoritative interpretation).
• on whether to change the definition of marriage from between a man and woman to between two people (voted not to make the change).
• on whether or not to move forward toward adding the Belhar Confession, developed in South Africa as a response to Apartheid) to our Book of Confessions (voted to keep the process moving toward accepting the new confession).
• on whether or not to recommend a replacement of the entire Form of Government section for the Book of Order—claiming to be shorter, less regulatory, and more empowering of diverse ways to respond to local needs (voted for the replacement, it now goes to presbyteries for their vote).
• on whether to denounce Caterpillar company for knowingly profiting on unjust uses of its products to harm Palestinians (yes) and whether to advocate divestment from Caterpillar (voted no) or to continue dialog with the company (voted yes).
• On a report on the Middle East that was modified in committee through a process that many (USA Presbyterians, Jewish and Palestinian participants) called miraculous, finding ways to move back from strident, relationship-damaging language to more respectful, yet pointed language on Israel and Palestine.

With all these weighty topics, it was interesting that the General Assembly was less interested in rocking the boat and more interested in moving into the future together. Again and again participants pointed to their awareness of the spiritual nature of what they were doing, and of the need to find common ground to move forward together. This was a different GA.
Not that this GA was always consistent in its peacemaking. Those who wanted sea-change language largely did not get it and went home unhappy. And certainly, the change in the ordination standards paragraph ruffled a lot of feather. However, in general the body did work to find middle ground, and embodied a group that valued mutual respect and wanted that for the whole church. I found the meeting refreshing.
Personally, I thought the debate on ordination standards surfaced the major theme of the GA. More than one person spoke of the need to focus on the Form of Government change rather than same-sex relationships. They pointed out that issues concerning same-sex relationships tend to “suck all other air out of the room” for presbyteries and congregations so that they cannot give adequate consideration to other important topics. Right now, the argument went, we are at a time for asking how we understand our purpose and calling as Christians, as congregations, as middle-governing bodies and as a denomination. We are at a different time in history and we must open ourselves to new discernment of our identity and our purpose. The New Form of Government asks us to take this question seriously, and so we must give our greatest attention to it for a while.
No one was saying that same-sex relationships are unimportant. However, we all know that a legislative vote does not eliminate the division on the topic within our churches. Voting 53% to 46% to change the ordination standards may result in changed wording, but it won’t decide the issue. No matter what happens when the presbyteries vote on the change, we can be sure that the question will come back again in some form at the next General Assembly.
The 219th General Assembly seemed to be asking us to take seriously how to do more than just battle with one another within the church. We need to recognize that we disagree and will disagree on some things. But we also need to recognize that we were saved by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8) for the good works God prepared beforehand for us to do (Ephesians 2:10). In my opinion, we are in a time right now to stop focusing on distrust and attacks within the church, and to focus on discerning next steps in our common mission together.

Friday, July 9, 2010

PC(USA) July 8 at General Assembly

Hi, everyone,

Below you will see my list of significant decisions made by General Assembly on July 8. This is a very brief list, using my words and not the official (and often long) wording actually passed by the general assembly. For more detailed information, go to the pcusa.org web site and look for GA news.

This has been a GA characterized by significant decisions. The debates have been very civil, and commissioners have visibly embodied a great sense of mutual respect, and eve agape love though they have divided strongly on many of the votes.

For today and tomorrow, I will leave most of my personal reflections out of this blog, and instead simply list what I believe are the actions of most interest to the people in the Presbytery of Yukon. However, I have to admit that watching this process and listening to people reflecting on our changing society, I am moved by the stirrings of the Spirit among us, Who I believe is drawing us into a new way of being the church. Also, in the light of the amazing worship services held as a part of this event, I am considering again the role and power of worship in our lives together. I would like to write a few reflections on such things later (maybe starting Monday) in the hopes of hearing back from others of you on your own thoughts regarding how God is forming and reforming the church today.

One other side note: I very much enjoyed dinner with many of the Presbytery of Yukon folks last night (what a great group) and the fellowship of the Synod of Alaska Northwest lunch. Last month’s redefinition of synod mission and practice seems to be at the cutting edge of what so many are calling for across our denomination! I look forward to sharing more with you at a later date.

Peace,
Curt




07 08 10 Thursday GA Notes


2. Voted to give certified Christian Editors who are also elders voice and vote at presbytery, both during their years of service and in retirement.

3. Voted (53% for, 46% against, 1% abstaining) to ask presbyteries to vote on a change in the Book of Order replacing the wording of ordination standards in G-06.0106b from the following:

Those who are called to office in the church are to lead a life in obedience to Scripture and in conformity to the historic confessional standards of the church. Among these standards is the requirement to live either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman (W-4.9001), or chastity in singleness. Persons refusing to repent of any self-acknowledged practice which the confessions call sin shall not be ordained and/or installed as deacons, elders, or ministers of the Word and Sacrament.

to the following:

Standards for ordained service reflect the church’s desire to submit joyfully to the Lordship of Jesus Christ in all aspects of life (G-1.0000). The governing body responsible for ordination and/or installation (G.14.0240; G-14.0450) shall examine each candidate’s calling, gifts, preparation, and suitability for the responsibilities of office. The examination shall include, but not be limited to, a determination of the candidate’s ability and commitment to fulfill all requirements as expressed in the constitutional questions for ordination and installation (W-4.4003). Governing bodies shall be guided by Scripture and the confessions in applying standards to individual candidates.”

4. Voted not to take action on changes in guidance to pastors or sessions on civil unions, but instead voted to send presbyteries and congregations two reports from the committee assigned to study this, one from the majority of the committee and on from the minority. The two sides split on their recommendations, and the assembly decided studying the thinking of both sides would be helpful. To assist in this, GA also voted to encourage all sessions to engage in study of issues of biblical interpretation using the General Assembly papers, “Presbyterian Understanding and Use of Holy Scripture” and “Biblical Authority and Interpretation.”

5. In this era of reviewing financial justice in America’s corporations, the GA voted to study justice in GAMC salaries, seeking criteria to assure there would not be an unjust disparity between the salaries of the lowest and highest paid church employees.

6. Voted to lift up the Creation Care policy of 1993 and strengthen it with the additions listed below (to see the full document, go to the resources section of our presbytery’s Earthcare web site: www.yukonpresbyteriansforearthcare.ning.com).

Additions:
"[4. Affirm that concern for God's creation is, for every Christian, an essential way of living faithfully in Christ's world that will necessitate personal study of, attention to and engagement with emerging and new environmental concerns that are persistent, acute, and pressing.
"[5. Affirm that the best available science should inform our care for God's creation, shaping the direction of responsible programming and policy, especially with respect to public witness concerning emergent environmental issues such as global climate change, desertification and access to potable water, and wetlands/coastal erosion.
"[6. Affirm that all living creatures require potable water to live; that water, being essential to life, is a human right that must be accessible to all people.]"

7. Voted that the study paper, Living a Human Life Before God, be distributed electronically to ministers and congregations of the PC(USA) for the purpose of helping congregations explore and teach Christian ethics as they face today’s issues.

8. Voted to stand in solidarity with immigrant people in Arizona and call for just immigration reform, and to refrain from scheduling Presbyterian meetings in Arizona until their immigration law is improved.

9. Established an administrative commission empowered for the next to years to allow presbyteries and synods, the middle governing bodies of the church, to redraw their boundaries, when the affected middle governing bodies request it, and with a 2/3 majority vote of the administrative commission